Better pass boldly into that other world, in the full glory of some passion, than fade and wither dismally with age.
Do not go gentle into that good night, Old age should burn and rave at close of day; Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
Though much is taken, much abides; and though We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are; One equal temper of heroic hearts, Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.
Alfred Lord Tennyson
I’m trying to get faster. Not faster than I ever was, but faster than I am today. Best finish in 4 years and 4 tries at the USATF Masters National 10K Championships. Seventeenth place in 34:50. Results here.
This means two things. One, I’m focused on my training in a way I haven’t in years. Two, no one is going to read this.
A few months ago I decided to try something new with my running goals. Instead of setting racing goals, I set a few training goals. In the past I would set goals such as, I want to break 16 minutes for the 5k (never happened), or I want to break 4:30 for the mile (happened in 2011). Over the last couple years my racing goals became more modest, but even those I failed to hit. This year my goals were focused on training, and I believe they are if not easy to obtain, at least something I know I can accomplish with dedication and a little bit of luck.
My first goal was to run everyday for a month. I believe the most consecutive days of running I’ve ever done is 21 or 22 days. I wasn’t going to worry about total mileage for the month, I was just going to get in a run everyday. I was planning on doing this in July or August because I thought my schedule might allow for more flexibility. Then I found myself 20 days into April without having missed a day and decided to just close out the month and check this one goal off my list. The streak started on March 29 and went through April 30th so I actually went a few days over. I ended up running 205 miles for April, marking only the 3rd time in as many years I’ve gone over 200 miles in a month. I also ran a 34:50 10K, (more on this in my next post) I hadn’t broken 35 minutes since May of 2015. You can checkout my running log by clicking here.
I’ll write about my other 2 training goals as I accomplish them. I plan to do one in July and the other in September, but who knows, they might come earlier if my training stays on track.
As for Twitter. I deleted my 10 year old account for one simple reason. On balance I generally felt worse after spending time on Twitter. It was a net negative in my life. I no longer see any reason to continually infect my brain with the thoughts of people I don’t know or care about. Having already deleted Facebook, Instagram, and Snapchat (although I never really used Snapchat), the only social media service I still use is reddit. Reddit doesn’t make me feel bad, I know there is plenty of awful shit on that site, but I never interact with people or go to sketchy sub-reddits, and mostly just enjoy the pop culture news and silly animal gifs.
If you want to reach-out to me, leave a comment below or shoot me an email at email@example.com
This will be the last time I complain about hills for at least 6 months, I promise. After racing a very hilly 10 miler and a very hilly 15K in the past month, I was hoping a moderately hilly 5 miler would feel easy. It did not.
Sunday was the Red’s Shoe Barn Race for a Better Community 5 Miler (Red’s). Red’s was the second race in the New Hampshire Grand Prix. I’m running the series with the Greater Derry Track Club. It doesn’t conflict with my USATF Central Mass Striders racing, and it is nice to get in more races close to home. And If I’m being honest, it is nice not to finish so far back from the leaders.
The race starts and finishes in downtown Dover, NH and rolls it’s way through some neighborhoods and farmland in between. I allowed my expectations of some of the runners in front of me to dictate my pace too much in the middle miles. 1 runner took off into the lead and opened a gap early, and a few smaller packs of 2-3 runners each formed up behind him. I ended up caught between 2 of the packs in 8th place for a bunch of the middle miles. I could see the first chase pack, and knew one of the runners in that pack had beat me by over a minute at my last 5 miler. I thought as long as I was keeping him in sight I was doing well so I didn’t push hard to move up to them. It turns out however that he had raced the day before, and was saving his energy for the last mile.
The steepest hill on the course was right at the 4 mile mark, but was proceeded by a half mile gradual uphill. By the top of the hill I had moved into 4th pace and closed the gap on the 2nd and 3rd place runners to about 15 seconds. During the final downhill stretch of the race the eventual 2nd place finisher (who had beat me by a minute 2 months ago) put another 10 seconds on me to finish in 27:54. I managed to make up a little ground on the 3rd place runner, but he held me off for a 28:11. I finished in 4th, matching my time from the Boston Tune-up 5 Miler of 28:19.
I’m disappointed with my time. I had set out with the intention of running 5:30 pace. It seemed a reasonable goal after my last 2 longer races in 5:52 then 5:46 pace, but I just had no get up and go in my legs. I’m going to chalk that up to having just run my best race in years 6 days earlier. On the upside, I scored 10 out of 10 points for the 40-49 age group and 9 out of 10 points in the age grade scoring for the New Hampshire Grand Prix. I’m going to have to finish in the top 2 of each of those categories for the rest of the races if I want to have any chance to win the series. It is good motivation for me during these races. I need both a good place, and a good time because of the age grade scoring.
The next race in the New Hampshire Grand Prix is the Gate City Half Marathon in May. Before that I have the USATF Masters 10k Championship at the end of April. My goal is break 35 minutes for the first time since the 2015 Lilac 10k.
Another race another day running up and down hills. In western New York hills are rare, and races with lots of hills were even rarer. But out here flat races are hard to find, especially flat races longer than 5k. Fresh off the Ed Erichson 10 Miler where I was battling for the win, I headed down to Upton, MA for the Frank Nealon 15K where I was back to mostly battling the clock. Like the Ed Erichson this race had about 500 feet of climb, but unlike the Ed Erichson this race was loaded with really fast runners.
When I ran this race last year I was just coming off a back injury that prevented me from pushing the downhills, this year I was determined to take full advantage of any part of the race that wasn’t up. The result was a masters 15K PR of 53:50, a 2 minute improvement over last year, and a 6 second per mile improvement over my Ed Erichson 10 mile time (5:52 down to 5:46). This was a USATF New England Grand Prix race again this year, which means I wasn’t going to get my first win of the year. Last year I finished 81st overall and 9th in my age-group (40-49). I made good improvement in both those categories this year, finishing in 56th overall and 7th in my age-group (40-49). Results here.
A coworker asked me what was better, having lots of people around to race with or, being out front alone trying to win a race. For me, being out in front (either overall or in my age-group) generally brings out the best times. I run well when I’m scared and determined not to give up what I’ve held for so long. It keeps me pushing hard in an effort to put the race away. When running with lots of other runners mid pack it is easy to get complacent. If the pack your with slows down, you often don’t even notice. You assume you are running well because you are staying with the group. I usually try to look ahead to a new pack and try to move up, rather than run at the front of my current pack.
It has been a better than expect start of the racing season for me. I was pleasantly surprised by my 10 miler, and didn’t think I would improve so much in just a few weeks. But now is when I have to tell you my dark secret. I ran the Frank Nealon 15K in a pair of Nike Vaporfly 4%. If you aren’t familiar with the Vaporfly 4%, they were designed as part of Nike’s Breaking 2 project, and a decent amount of research does suggest they are capable of producing about a 4% improvement in running economy. You can see some of the research here:
That alleged 4% improvement does come at a price, they are about $100 more than I would normally spend on a pair of Adidas Adios racing shoes. But I found a good deal on a pair, and plan to only race in them, not do workouts in them so I’m hoping they last for a year of racing. It is also cheaper than buying beet juice shots to drink for a few days before every race, and cheaper than a oxygen regulating bed tent. So financial justifications aside, there are just the ethical questions of running in a shoe that improves your performance by 4%.
Several years ago I started doing all my training and racing in Adidas shoes with boost. Here is the teaser ad they ran for the material.
I was sold on the boost right away, I never saw a performance improvement wearing it like I had hoped for, but they did feel very comfortable, and I especially like the Boston series for training in. At the time most people were doubtful that they would be any faster than any other racing shoe, I don’t recall hearing anyone clamoring for them to be banned. But things have been different with the Vaporfly 4%. There was an immediate and now persistent argument against them being legal, but besides some odd nitpicks about how many spikes a shoe can have, the USATF doesn’t have much to say about shoes. The 2019 competition rules state
A competitor may compete in bare feet or with footwear on one or both feet. The purpose of shoes for competition is to give protection and stability to the feet and a firm grip of the ground. Such shoes, however, must not be constructed so as to give the competitor any unfair assistance or advantage.
Rule 143 3. a.
A few years ago (before Nike gave USATF $500 million dollars) the same rule read…
A competitor may compete in bare feet or with footwear on one or both feet. The purpose of shoes for competition is to give protection and stability to the feet and a firm grip of the ground. Such shoes, however, must not be constructed so as to give the competitor any unfair additional assistance, including the incorporation of any technology which will give the wearer any unfair advantage, such as a spring or similar device. A shoe strap over the instep is permissible.
Rule 143 3. a.
So what does it mean for a shoe to give an unfair assistance or advantage? Clearly the rule is about the unfair part, not the assistance or advantage part. A lighter shoe is going to give an advantage over a heavy shoe. Any changes in mid-sole materials is done to give assistance and advantage whether is boost, fresh foam, or zoomx. Are changes to shoe technology only an issue if the positive result is too large? If so what is the allowable limit of improvement? These are questions that the USATF has not bothered to answer, except through their silence. Other sports such as, golf, swimming, and baseball are much clearer about what constitutes illegal equipment.
I don’t know if these shoes are really making me run like I’m 40 again, or if my improving race times are the result of finally doing long runs again. Maybe spending 2 hours a day less in the car is paying off, or it might be sleeping more than 7 hours a night. Whatever the reason, I’m going to keep wearing my cheating shoes until someone tells me I’m not allowed to. Or until Adidas makes something better.